A Newt America

Newt Gingrich, the Family Values candidate who practices serial adultery, serves divorce papers on women recovering from cancer, and flips positions with the frequency of a ham radio (“Whatever Obama said, I’m against it!”), has once again demonstrated why Republicans consider him the smartest man in the room:

I have two grandchildren: Maggie is 11; Robert is 9. I am convinced that if we do not decisively win the struggle over the nature of America, by the time they’re my age they will be in a secular atheist country, potentially one dominated by radical Islamists and with no understanding of what it once meant to be an American.

It should be no surprise that what comes out of Gingrich’s mouth is at odds with anything remotely resembling reality – Newt has built his career flying in the face of facts and ignoring plain truth, but it’s remarkable that the man can fundamentally contradict himself within the span of a single sentence. And it’s not merely the flagrant imbecility of conflating “secular atheist” with “radical Islamist”, but the the rather more insidious and ugly fact that what Newt would like to see created in order to prevent those two polar opposites from becoming the same thing (!) is a theocratic Christian state where creationism is taught in the science class and women would be forced to remain pregnant for Jesus.

Is there no level of stupid at which even Americans realize they’re being played like a rube in a three-card-Monty scam?


4 Responses

  1. I had just read that at HuffPo. I can’t believe Gingrich really thinks Muslims are atheists.
    But I do think he is a scheming psychopath who will blurt out any talking points he thinks will score points with the trailer-park crowd.

  2. My mistake: Pharyngula, not Huffpo.
    That aside, he’s still a doughy, pretentious sack of shit, with a tasty coating of infected phlegm. I really hope his pandering to the Teabaggers works. He’d be fun to run against.
    I wonder if he thinks women really like him for his looks. Or his mind. Or …. why the hell *do* women sleep with him?

  3. When you can contradict yourself withing the same sentence with the same deliberate voracity and not notice or care (or be called on it), you’ve had the microphone in your hand a decade or two too long.

    Speaking of overstaying their welcome, any thoughts on posting a topic on the Canuck election, Cousinavi?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: